top of page

       April 2024 Pandemic Summary            by Sheila Hemphill 

As you recall, rumblings regarding COVID-19 began in January of 2020.  Having provided marketing and web development services for integrative and functional physicians, researchers, consultants, and attorneys since 2008, I am blessed with a very informed group of professionals and experts in medicine.  See the list of 2023 bills I testified on. 


In February of 2020, my dear Greek doctor, Constantine "Gus" Kotsanis, said,
"Sheila, don't worry about this virus, ozone will take care of it.  But don't talk about ozone, they kill people over ozone."

​On March 10, 2020, the Texas Public Health Committee had its only hearing regarding the news of a potential pandemic.  The discussion predominately consisted of hand sanitizers, disinfectants, and masking.  At this time, the graphic depiction of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from the CDC was the ball with “red triangles” on it.  I informed staffers that the “red triangles” on the ball represented the spike protein structure that your body would need to recognize to develop antibodies to attach to it to attack it.  The problem was that by the time the vaccine was developed and the immune system’s antibodies were programmed to seek and attack the “red triangle” spike proteins, the architecture of the spike protein would have mutated and the virus architecture would no longer be a “triangle” structure. I knew this because Taiwanese news was already reporting how rapidly the virus would mutate.  Therefore, the vaccine would not be effective but worse could cause harm to other human proteins that were similar to the “triangle” structure and start attacking 28 different human tissues.  SEE REPORT.


Given that Italy had been ground zero, I put the word out and a friend connected me to Dr. Marianno Franzini, President of the Scientific Society of Oxygen Ozone Therapy (SIOOT).  During an online meeting, he was reporting on the rapid effectiveness of ozone as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of COVID-19.  Dr. Franzini had received permission from the equivalent of Italian's FDA to use ozone in 15 hospitals and provided the therapy via home health services as well.  The SIOOT released a comparative report stating, "Oxygen ozone therapy is a success for COVID-19 in Italy – 94% of non‐intubated and 73% of intubated patients rapidly recover. By comparison, only 20% of NYC’s intubated patients recover at all." Early reports showed that this therapy reversed inflammation markers in 8 hours and achieved negative test results in 5 days. While Italy was able to remove 75% of their patients who were on ventilators New York was reporting an 80% death rate occurring with their ventilated patients.  ​Note:  The ozone therapy discussed in these interviews is known as Major AutoHemo (MAH) treatment.  From a layperson’s perspective, MAH ozone treatment is similar to “donating blood” of less than 7 oz of blood that has ozone gas bubbled into a heparinized bag and the patient receives their own ozonated blood back.  See About Ozone.


Dr. Franzini and his colleagues also stated the autopsies they performed were showing blood clots not pneumonia and also noted a problem with the ferritin on the hemoglobin inhibiting the oxygenation of the body.   NOTE:  Interesting that the 5G frequencies oscillate the oxygen molecule, could 5G frequencies contribute to the hemoglobin’s inability to transport oxygen?

​The early assumption of US officials was that COVID-19 was similar to the SARS outbreak in the early 2000s which resulted in pneumonia and thus the call for more ventilators.  If the patient's oxygen dipped into the 80s and dropped below a certain threshold, the protocol was to use high oxygen to push through the fluid of pneumonia.  But as the Italians had noted, COVID-19 was not pneumonia. The US protocol of using high-pressure oxygen proved to exacerbate the patient’s condition and cause worse damage and death. 

​I knew I had to help make the world aware of this viable safe, ozone treatment for COVID-19 because all the US officials were saying was to lock down, not treat, no autopsies, With the warning that "they kill people over ozone”, I thought I better say it loud enough so everyone knows. So on April 1, 2020, I issued this press release. Texas Right to Know Calls on US to Consider COVID-19 Ozone Therapy After It Shows Promise in Italy

This ozone press release was picked up by AP News, Yahoo, and Market Watch and went around the world.  Unknown to me, a person from the Philippines contacted me and asked me if I knew what I had done, and I said, “No.”  He said this press release stated that COVID could be treated as the first treatment announced in US media.  I received emails from around the world including Wuhan University Hospital, Spain, Japan, South America, etc. with reports of ozone’s effectiveness and collated their reports as seen here.


Since 2016, I have been working on medical board issues as a member of the public conveying the abuses reported by integrative and functional physicians and their attorneys, so I was very familiar with the problems existing in the medical board's rules regarding violations for not following “standard of care.”  Since ozone was a word, “not to be spoken”, it was convenient that I had brought up at the early March 2020 TMB meeting asking the board for help to find ozone treatment in Houston for a young man diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis.  On May 21, 2020, I submitted a rule change request to the Texas Medical Board (TMB) regarding rule 190.8 - Violation for not following "Standard of Care".  On June 23, 2020, the TMB responded and I issued the following press release. Texas Medical Board Clarifies Access To Ozone Therapy for the Treatment of COVID-19.  Knowing that the TMB did not post its board meetings online, it took legislative involvement urging the TMB to issue a press release which was issued on 7/31/21. 

With this network of incredible international and national physicians and researchers, most of 2020, I spent on Zoom meeting with a cardiologist reviewing medical studies, Pfizer clinical trials, etc.  In particular, was information from a Scottish researcher who had studied large ape brains for 20 years in Japan.  His work on brain mapping was instrumental in developing drugs for Tourette’s, dementia, Alzheimer’s, and other neurological illnesses. 

As a graphic artist, I would take the information they provided and develop graphic 12 x 18 posters to aid in laypeople’s understanding of what a spike protein is, how the NIH said the protein appeared, and how its function was similar to computer code with components originating from the HIV and attributes associated with viper venom. 

In March of 2021, the poster started with the title asking the question, “Is the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Spike Protein Architecture a BioWeapon?”  In the fall of 2021, the question was answered when a Freedom of Information Request (FOIA) of Anthony Fauci’s emails was produced.  Fauci’s March 11, 2020, contained an email with the subject line, “Coronavirus Bioweapon Production Method.”  The first sentence, “This is how the virus was created.”   This is the same period that the news and the White House officials were saying it came from a wet market in Wuhan.  In my 2023 testimony before the Texas Senate Health and Human Resources Committee (SHHRC), I read the comments from Dr. Shi Zhengli, A.K.A. "The Bat Lady", Director of the Centre for Emergency of Infectious Disease and Biosafety at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, "we re-engineered HKU4 spike, aiming to build its capacity to mediate viral entry into human cells.”


By January 2021, the COVID-19 vaccine was in mass distribution directed under the State Department of Health Services (DSHS).  After hearings, I would stop the staff of the Texas Division of Emergency Management( TDEM) and DSHS if they were aware of the Fauci emails and the statements of Bat Lady and none of them had a clue.

After confirmation that there was a "safe and effective" treatment with ozone, why would we be pursuing the vaccine?  According to the PREP act, if there is an adequate, approved or alternative drug available, they could not have received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the COVID-19 vaccines.  By the spring of 2021, the number of adverse events was skyrocketing as evidenced by the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, (VAERS).   See VAERS and Stats Chart.  How could they still be saying the COVID-19 vaccine was "safe and effective" in the same sentence that the shot was not FDA-approved?  I knew that if a functional or integrative physician made any claim that a non-FDA-approved product had benefit, they would get a letter from the Texas Attorney General of violating the 15 USC 41 Consumer Protection Act.



My ever-hopeful aspiration was that if the legislators saw the evidence, the ozone success, Fauci's emails, Bat Lady's comments, injuries and deaths skyrocketing from COVID-19, and the fatal treatments of high-pressure oxygen and Remdesivir, etc. Texas would certainly call for the vaccinations to halt.    After 18 months of research, writing, zoom meetings, in office meetings, it became apparent, that the truth didn't matter to the legislators.  They only listened to the DC dictates.  Many told me they believed me but what I was telling them was not in the media, communicated from the state agencies or the Universities.  I distributed the evidence to the offices of the Governor, Lt. Governor, Speaker, committee member, and the Attorney General office.  Finally, in Fall of 2023, Texas passed a law prohibiting a COVID-19 mandate by private employers.



The July 11, 2021 interview by Reiner Fuellmich and David Martin was a real game changer.  When many interviewers want to interject, ask questions, and keep their audience's attention, Fuellmich lets Martin run like a deposition.  Fact, after fact, as seen in published materials or evidence found in patents shows the premeditated intent of the pandemic and who owns the patents.  The report has a table of contents, an executive summary, data from the WorldOMeter, and highlights from the word-for-word transcription of the interview contained in the green sidebar area. The paragraphs are numbered and the sentences are highlighted such that black bolded is significant, red bolding is shocking, and red bolded underlined is alarming.  The back 30 pages are the Fauci/COVID019 Dossier that outlines 9 federal charges for criminal conspiracy and racketeering.

Example from Green bar, paragraph 12, "We made SARS and we patented it on April 19, 2002", funded by Fauci in 1999, patent number 7279327.

The Fuellmich/Martin interview was a game changer in that it contained irrefutable information that no one could argue with.  Remember, hardly anyone ever agrees on medicine and science.  In August of 2021, during the special session,  I delivered 250 copies of the Omega Brief to every office in the Capitol, the Governor's office, the Attorney General, and the TMB.  

The Omega Brief was developed as a tool for citizens to take this evidence to their County Court, City Council, school boards, etc. This link to the full Omega Report also includes testimonies in front of the Senate HHS Committee hearings demonstrating the best way to utilize 2-minute citizen comments to explain the structure of the report and start reading off the alarming statements. by stacking people's testimonies.


The Grey Border deck card 1 side 1, is a brief of the alarming details from The Omega Brief.


In an October 8, 2021 letter from the White House, it was clear from President Biden's writing stating, "I signed into law, the American Rescue Plan, a law that will help vaccinate America ... we are on the path to vaccinating the nation."  

On October 5, Senate Bill 8 allocated $16.3 billion of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to municipalities.  On October 6 at a local City Council meeting, a council member asked me if I had seen the contracts for the Coronavirus funds that contained the terms and conditions that required compliance with federal statutes and regulations, which have always been the "federal strings" but now these contracts included compliance with executive orders that can come and go with the stroke of a pen.   

The Coronavirus funds were contracts between the City or County and directly with the US Treasury.  The state legislators were not aware of the contracts, since SB 8 simply determined which city received how much money.

Arguments have been presented that we are required to follow executive orders already.  Yes, but there is a big difference between an executive order issued as a declaration such that the Attorney General can fight the rogue order.  There is a big difference between a declared order and consent to terms by contract.  For further complication, Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution states, No state shall...pass any law... impairing the obligation of contract.

On October 27, 2021, I issued a press release entitled, "Will Governor Abbott Save Texas from Transfer of Sovereignty by Contract?".  Shortly after both AG Paxton and Governor Abbott issued letters urging agencies to be carefully reading their contracts.  See Coronavirus Funds.


On November 7, 2021, the Texas Municipal League willfully misinforms cities regarding the receipt of Coronavirus funds stating on their website, "The Agreement does not create a contractual relationship between the non-entitlement Recipient City and any department or division of the federal government."  FALSE!

See communications with Bill Longley, General Counsel for TML, requesting a copy of the notice sent to their members informing them of their errant opinion.  As of 12/17/21 - No reply.  

The Grey Border deck card 1 side 2  is a summary of the Coronavirus Funds.


In the 2013 opinion of the United States SupremeCourt Case, ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY ET AL. v. MYRIAD GENETICS, INC.,


-   The Court held: "A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring." pg 2,

-   "It is also possible to create DNA synthetically through processes similarly well known in the field of genetics. One such method begins with an mRNA molecule and uses the natural bonding properties of nucleotides to create a new, synthetic DNA molecule." pg 6."

-  "all three [judges] agreed that patent claims relating to cDNA met the patent eligibility requirements." pg 13.

See Robert v. Austin court case.

Sheila advocated and achieved the following to be added to the Texas Republican Platform:

"All humans are endowed by their creator with sovereign rights of ownership of their person and DNA, regardless of any DNA modification, and claims to the contrary are invalid." #219

The Red Border deck card 2 side 3 is a summary of the DNA ownership.


On December 7, 2022, Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson conducted hearings with individuals who were tracking the corruption of the pandemic management.  

The Red Border deck card 2 side 4 is a summary of the Washington Hearing.


On June 27, 2022, the Texas Legislature is in special session and the Senate HHS Committee is taking 2-minute testimonies of the pandemic response.  Often the hearings can start at 8:00 AM, which doesn't include travel time, and then the Committee will break around 10:00 to go to the floor.  They may not reconvene until 11:00 PM to continue public testimony, so you are there all day long.  On June 28, 2022, after arriving home around 1:00 AM, the next morning my husband directed me to the interview with Katherine Watt disclosing her forensic review of  federal laws over decades related to public health she entitled, "The American Domestic Bioterrorism Program." 


This information was alarming, however, it explained how the CDC, NIH, and government officials have been able to declare a non-FDA drug as having claims of being "Safe and Effective" while simultaneously killing and maiming people as reported on VAERS and for time reported by individuals on social media until they were censored.  

Under the declaration of a Public Health Emergency, per the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), for EUA products:

  1. The only standard for establishing the efficacy of an EUA product is a declaration by the HHS Secretary that a product “may be effective,"

  2. There are no required product safety standards,

  3. There are no informed consent duties,

  4. There are no product safety standards,

  5. There are no manufacturing guidelines, etc.


The Blue Border deck card 3 side 5 is a summary of the Public Health Emergency.


In March of 2023, I became aware of the April 2022 Brook Jackson Whistleblower fraud case against Pfizer.  Through discovery, Pfizer's motion to dismiss document answered many of my questions that I had never known to even ask or could even imagined could exist in a document that was to deliver an emergency use product. 

  1. The contract was with the Department of Defense (DOD) - not the CDC, not Homeland Security, not the NIH, but rather as a DOD project, it is classified as a military countermeasure and not a drug. 

  2. The Statement of Work is to provide a COVID-19“large-scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration”, that "imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices (GCP) or FDARegulations", and "Pfizer's 'clinical trials' are 'out of scope' and 'not related' to the agreement."

  3. What's the contract?  DOD orders X number of doses and Pfizer received $19.50 a dose.

The continuation of the COVID-19 "so-called vaccine" is a scam and poses a public health hazard jeopardizing the lives and livelihoods of citizens of the world. The definition of vaccines had to change because traditionally most laypeople remember when a vaccine was to prevent infection which means you don't have the disease again.  This is clearly not the case with this gene editing technology.  Also, I have been told that a drug's ability to "lessen severity" was never a condition to receive FDA approval.  See below for the changes in vaccine definitions.  

See the 1291 COVID-19 "Adverse Events of SPECIAL  INTEREST" on pg 30 that Pfizer knew about on February 28, 2021.

The Blue Border deck card 3 side 6 is a summary of the Pfizer Motion to Dismiss.


From James Roguski, March 31, 2024  Please follow his work.

The proposed amendments are not about mandates, lockdowns or your relationship with your doctor.  The proposed amendments are NOT an attack on national sovereignty." 

"In fact, the proposed W.H.O. amendments are an EXTREMELY dangerous expression OF national sovereignty."

Unfortunately, requiring that foreign travelers meet national entry requirements is NOT “unconstitutional.” Such requirements would NOT be over-reach by the federal government. Such requirements would NOT be a violation of the 10th Amendment.


Nations have the sovereign right to control their borders. The skilled lawyers at the WHO know this and THAT is why this is such a big problem.

The proposed amendments to Articles 24 and 27 will NOT be neutralized by state legislation or “state nullification” because the requirements in these amendments would fall upon foreign citizens, not state citizens.

The proposed amendments to Articles 24 and 27 would NOT be neutralized even by exiting the WHO, because if other nations agree to the proposed amendments to Articles 24 and 27 (and others), then those nations would have the national sovereign right along with the additional backing of the International Health Regulations to “compel the traveler to undergo… vaccination or other prophylaxis.”

The amendments below can ONLY be stopped by massive, worldwide public outrage combined with a DEMAND TO REJECT THE AMENDMENTS.

The Green Border deck card 4 side 7 is a summary of the Threats from W.H.O.


Those of us who were aware of the gross government control of information was confirmed by evidence of all-out attacks of censorship revealed with the Twitter purchase by Elon Musk.  This evidence showed showed government conspiracy to deceive and defraud the people.  The CDC, NIH, and CMS (Medicare) policies were used to prosecute physicians who were upholding their integrity to heal and protect their patients by treating them with ozone, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and Budesimide to name a few.  

The Green Border deck card 4 side 8 is a summary of the FLCCC Prevention Protocols

Grey Border Deck 1 Side 1 and Side 2   


  Blue Border Deck 3 Side 5 and Side 6 

 Red Border Deck 2 Side 3 and Side 4

  Green Border Deck 4 Side 7 and Side 8




On January 9, 2023, Congressman Andy Biggs from the 5th District in Arizona submitted House Resolution 79 (The W.H.O. Withdrawal Act).
H.R. 79 would stop all United States (U.S.) funding of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) and begin the one-year process of the U.S. removing itself from the W.H.O. Amendments were approved by unelected U.S. officials on May 27, 2022. The amendment to Article 59 changed the time frame for approval of amendments from 18 months to 10 months and changed the time for enforcement from 24 months to 12 months. These amendments to the International Health Regulations will be “approved by default” on December 1, 2023, unless rejected by the President. THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN!

There are over 300 amendments being reviewed for the W.H.O. meeting in May of 2024.

bottom of page